Template:Did you know nominations/Anatolian crested newt
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Anatolian crested newt
edit- ... that ....?
- ALT1:...The Anatolian crested newt is a cryptic species only shown genetically to be distinct?
- ALT2:...The Anatolian crested newt is morphologically indistinguishable from its sister species?
- ALT3:...The Anatolian crested newt is endemic to northern Anatolia?
- ALT4:...The Anatolian crested newt was only described in 2016?
Created by Tylototriton (talk). Self-nominated at 13:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC).
- New enough and long enough.
Looks to me like the images used are both in breach of copyright (taken from a journal article, with copyright notice, and no CC license immediately evident).Otherwise well sourced, with no close paraphrasing, and a nice article. All hook facts check out, although I prefer one of the first two. Simon Burchell (talk) 16:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- The article was published under CC BY 3.0. You have to go to the pdf version to see the notice though: http://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.4109.1.6/20417 Tylototriton (talk) 08:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- OK, thanks - I see it. Good to go. Simon Burchell (talk) 09:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- The article was published under CC BY 3.0. You have to go to the pdf version to see the notice though: http://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.4109.1.6/20417 Tylototriton (talk) 08:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
- New enough and long enough.