- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 14:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Annie Åkerhielm
![Annie Åkerhielm](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Annie_%C3%85kerhielm_1959.JPG/114px-Annie_%C3%85kerhielm_1959.JPG)
Annie Åkerhielm
Created by Ashleyyoursmile (talk). Self-nominated at 10:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
Overall:
BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on the article, Ashleyyoursmile. The lead has "Åkerhielm was known as an active campaigner against women's suffrage and democracy." which I think is a little different from the cited body text that "Åkerhielm advocated against women's suffrage and democracy....." (Somebody being an advocate does not necessarily mean that they are known for it.) I'm open to hearing a counterargument, otherwise this should be easily resolved by a minor amendment in either the lead or body. The skbl.se source was checked via machine translation. The www.svd.se source wanted me to register, so I think a "url-access=registration" parameter should be added to that reference in the article, but all info for the hook is verified in the skbl.se source anyway. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- BennyOnTheLoose, my apologies. "Active campaigner" is correct and I have revised the prose accordingly in the body. Please let me know if anything else needs to be addressed. Thank you for the review. Ashleyyoursmile! 10:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, Ashleyyoursmile. Happy to approve this now. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)