- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:49, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Anthony J. Costello
- ... that in 2005, Anthony J. Costello and associates proposed that the nerves within the 'veil of Aphrodite' mainly supplied the prostate rather than to the corpora cavernosa? Menon described a belief that additional nerves important for sexual function list within ... the veil of aphrodite. The authors acknowledge that they have not traced these nerves to the corpora cavernosa. ..In distinction to Menon and associates, Costello...felt that the nerves located within the 'Veil of Aphrodite' primarily innervate the prostate. This finding was more recently confirmed... [1]
Created by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 18:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
A very useful article on a deserving subject. Thank you for this. And the bonus is the very enjoyable Face to Face interview transcript among the citations. You have done well to make the article understandable to the general reader who doesn't mind looking up a few words. Earwig only found acceptable similarities, e.g. your quotations, so no problem there. To me as a non-medic, I found ALT0 more immediately comprehensible than ALT1, because I had to look up "innervating". So unless anyone else objects, I prefer ALT0. The QPQ is done. I have not checked every citation link, but the ones that I looked at were OK. Good to go.
Storye book (
talk) 12:57, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
A very useful article on a deserving subject. Thank you for this. And the bonus is the very enjoyable Face to Face interview transcript among the citations. You have done well to make the article understandable to the general reader who doesn't mind looking up a few words. Earwig only found acceptable similarities, e.g. your quotations, so no problem there. To me as a non-medic, I found ALT0 more immediately comprehensible than ALT1, because I had to look up "innervating". So unless anyone else objects, I prefer ALT0. The QPQ is done. I have not checked every citation link, but the ones that I looked at were OK. Good to go. Storye book (talk) 12:57, 12 October 2020 (UTC)