Template:Did you know nominations/Aquos Phone SH-06D

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Aquos Phone SH-06D

edit

Created by ViperSnake151 (talk). Self nominated at 02:13, 16 June 2014 (UTC).

  • New enough (created 16 June, nom 16 June), long enough. QPQ done. Both the original hook and ALT1 check out with online citations #5 and #6. I think that ALT1 is more elegantly-worded and smoother to read, but that's just my opinion. The article text is objective and neutral, and is fully referenced. If the article had been still in production, I would have suggested that (to avoid advertising implications) the all-positive description and information be balanced by e.g. examples of any criticism or negative comparison, or perhaps the name(s) of product(s) which superseded this one. However the article does not contain hype, and I don't think text-changes for neutrality are necessary for this product. The product is still available on Amazon.com, but the availability is limited. It is no longer available on Amazon.co.uk. This information suggests that all or most sales of this item are individual and localised re-sales, i.e. not a line currently being promoted by a company. No problems with disambig links or with access to external links. All external links checked for possible sources of copyvio and close paraphrasing; none found. Good to go with original hook or ALT1 (I prefer ALT1). --Storye book (talk) 12:52, 9 July 2014 (UTC)