Template:Did you know nominations/Arostropsis

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (babble) @ 15:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Arostropsis

edit

Arostropsis snout and mandible

  • Reviewed: Paramelaconite
  • Comment: See text on page 79 of Yunakov & Kirejtshuk, 2011

Created/expanded by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 05:53, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Article length, date and sources are verified. Hook has an inline citation; AGF on offline sources. This is good to go. Yazan (talk) 13:30, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
  • ALT1: ... that ... The entire Arostropsis weevil species is known from only one specimen (pictured), which is 45 million years old.
Nice article ==> there seem to be many engaging hooks for this paleocenic critter; as well as its missing mandible. Geoffjw1978 T L C 00:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Done, but picture not included. Rcsprinter (babble) @ 15:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)