Template:Did you know nominations/Arthur Blackburn

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Arthur Blackburn

edit
Arthur Blackburn
Arthur Blackburn

Improved to Good Article status by Peacemaker67 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:09, 3 January 2019 (UTC).

  • Hi Peacemaker67, review follows: Article promoted to GA on 3 January; article is of good length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; no overly close paraphrasing noticed; hooks are both interesting and mentioned in the article; Damascus hook checks out to the Australian DNB, VC hook is cited to an offline book which I am happy to AGF on; image looks to be appropriately licensed (the AWM collections are down for me at the moment but I am happy to presume it states "public domain", most of their stuff does); QPQ has been done. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 08:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the confirmation Peacemaker67, I currently just get a "technical difficulties" message from the AWM page - Dumelow (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)