- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Atlas Tract
- ... that the Atlas Tract is farmland with a population of 0, but is expected to have a population of 42,000 by 2045? Source: Page 340 of ref from the article: "Municipal Service Review: Selected San Joaquin County Reclamation Districts" (PDF). San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission. E Mulberg & Associates. 18 March 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 March 2021. Retrieved 24 February
5x expanded by JPxG (talk). Self-nominated at 23:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC).
Hi JPxG, review follows: article more than 5x expanded on 17 November; article is well written and cited inline throughout to what appear to be reliable sources for the subject; I didn't spot any issues with overly close paraphrasing from the sources; hook is interesting, checks out to the source cited and is mentioned in the article; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 05:47, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
