- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- This hook is good to go; if you want to use it let me know and I'll pass the DYK. Catrìona (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- ALT1:
... that many works of Averroes (pictured) did not survive today in the original Arabic, but only as Latin or Hebrew translations? Source: "Adamson 2016, p. 180-181
- I would have written "... that many of Averroes' works did not survive in the original Arabic, but only as Latin or Hebrew translations?" I would not use "works of Averroes" in this context, but with the picture it is awkward either way. Catrìona (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- ALT1b:... that many of Averroes' works (Averrroes pictured) did not survive today in the original Arabic, but only as Latin or Hebrew translations? HaEr48 (talk) 06:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- ALT2:
... that Averroes (pictured) served as the chief judge of Córdoba and the Almohad court physician at the same time? Source: Arnaldez 1986, p. 910.
- Better "... and as the Almohad court physician..." Catrìona (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- ALT2b:... that Averroes (pictured) served as the chief judge of Córdoba and as the Almohad court physician at the same time?
- This hook is good too. I still don't like the second one, but you only need one hook anyway. Catrìona (talk) 12:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by HaEr48 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:13, 10 July 2018 (UTC).
- I'll be reviewing this one, comments to come. Catrìona (talk) 01:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited:
 - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting:
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: I'm concerned about plagiarism and this site with suspiciously similar phrasing: "..to a family with a long and well-respected tradition of legal and public service. His grandfather, the influential Abdul-Walid Muhammad (d. 1126), was the chief judge..." This was not mentioned in the GA review. Is there a way to confirm that this is copied from Wikipedia and not the other way around? Fixed by HaEr48 Catrìona (talk) 04:11, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Catrìona: Thanks for the review. I'm embarrassed that I missed that :| I reworded that sentence, and checked the rest of the earwig report (seems no more close paraphrasing issue). Let me know if there's more I could do. HaEr48 (talk) 13:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good now and the copyvio detector is not finding any other problems; see comments on the hooks. Catrìona (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Catrìona: I've replied to your comments on ALT1 and ALT2. Thanks for the review. HaEr48 (talk) 06:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
