Template:Did you know nominations/Baeoentedon bouceki
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Baeoentedon bouceki
- ... that the only known specimen of Baeoentedon bouceki is less than a millimetre long? Source: Three new species of Baeoentedon Girault (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from China, with the first record of whitefly host association (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)
- ALT1: ... that although collected from China in 1983, Baeoentedon bouceki was not formally described as a new species until 2014? Source: Three new species of Baeoentedon Girault (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from China, with the first record of whitefly host association (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Smin Awa Naing
- Comment: I suppose there are plenty of smaller organisms less than a millimetre long, but hopefully the way the first hook is worded will be eye-catching nonetheless.
Created by An anonymous username, not my real name (talk). Self-nominated at 02:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC).
Reviewing... Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:57, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- See comments - Interesting:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Good article. However, hook Alt1 doesn't exactly say that it was bouceki specifically that was found in 1983. I feel as if you should change the hook to make it a bit more specific here. Onegreatjoke (talk) 15:20, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- Forgot to ping @An anonymous username, not my real name: Onegreatjoke (talk) 15:21, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- I implemented your suggestion. Does it look ready now? An anonymous username, not my real name 16:54, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Better, Approving. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- I implemented your suggestion. Does it look ready now? An anonymous username, not my real name 16:54, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
