Template:Did you know nominations/Baseball's Sad Lexicon

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 23:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Baseball's Sad Lexicon

edit

Improved to Good Article status by Muboshgu (talk). Self nominated at 15:13, 15 April 2014 (UTC).

  • Newly-passed good article is long enough and was nominated a day after promotion. Duplication detector check of hook sources [1][2] reveal no close paraphrasing issues. Article is well-sourced. Hook is 121 characters long (ALT1 is 98); both are under the 200 character max and are interesting. Refs 4 and 10 (verifying the main and ALT1 hooks, respectively) are both reliable sources – the former from MLB.com; the latter from the Chicago Tribune. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 20:45, 18 April 2014 (UTC)