- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 21:37, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Battle of Malacca (1641)
Improved to Good Article status by An anonymous username, not my real name (talk). Self-nominated at 22:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
@An anonymous username, not my real name: Good article. Hook is interesting, article is sourced, and the QPQ is done.
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/Symbol_voting_keep.svg/16px-Symbol_voting_keep.svg.png)
Approving.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 13:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)