Template:Did you know nominations/Beef Bones Regulations 1997
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Beef Bones Regulations 1997
T-bone steak
- ... that it was illegal to sell a T-bone steak (example pictured) in Great Britain between 1997 and 1999? "under this new law to sell cuts of beef on the bone, such as prime ribs or T-bone steaks, would be a criminal offence" from: Booker, Christopher; North, Richard (2007). Scared to Death: From BSE to Global Warming: Why Scares are Costing Us the Earth. London: A&C Black. p. 117. ISBN 978-0-8264-7620-3.
- ALT1:... that Prince Charles was illegally served beef on the bone (example pictured) in a Newport Hotel in 1999? "Chefs at a hotel in Newport, south Wales, where Prince Charles was served illegal beef on the bone earlier this year, welcomed the decision." from: Meikle, James (1 December 1999). "Brown lifts beef on the bone ban". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 October 2020.
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 17:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC).
- Reviewing. New enough, long enough, important, QPQ provided, hooks are both good. Will complete soon. Whispyhistory (talk) 18:50, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I remember this well; it was parodied on a late night comedy show that I forget the name of (except I know Peter Baynham and David Schneider were in it), that listed a whole bunch of things like beef on the bone which were illegal, then had David drinking Tequila Slammers and throwing knives at Peter, which was the only thing presented that was not actually illegal. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Hooks in article and followed by citations containing hook facts. Both hooks are good and I don't have a preference. Image is good to go, no licence issues and it is clear. @Ritchie333:...I remember this well too, particularly impact on farmers. Dumelow... a well worth creation of an article. Thank you Whispyhistory (talk) 05:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
