Template:Did you know nominations/Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Skr15081997 (talk) 16:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden

edit

Created by Zigzig20s (talk). Self nominated at 15:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC).

  • New enough. Long enough. NPOV. Duplication Detector shows no unavoidable close paraphrasing or copyivos when checking the main online sources. Hook is cited and the article is well-cited generally. But, the hook seems verbose and unremarkable, so I've added two ALTs. I prefer ALT2. No QPQ done. Edwardx (talk) 16:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Sure, either one works. Zigzig20s (talk) 02:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Just the QPQ review of another DYK nomination to go... Edwardx (talk) 12:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
  • This nom has stagnated for two weeks so let's get it moving. I'm donating one of my many spare QPQs to this nom (e.g. this one). All three hooks check out with online citations #2, #5 and #7 (#5 only, for ALT2). Above review taken on trust. Good to go. --Storye book (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)