Template:Did you know nominations/Bowers v. Baystate Technologies

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 13:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Bowers v. Baystate Technologies

(

)

... that in Bowers v. Baystate Technologies the US Federal Circuit ruled that the Copyright Act does not preempt Harold L. Bowers' shrink wrap license which disallowed reverse engineering, causing a dissenting opinion from Judge Timothy B. Dyk?

Comment: This article is a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Intellectual Property law 2011 Berkeley

Created/expanded by Hattring (talk). Nominated by Bjulve-ucb (talk) at 23:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Alt hook: ... that in Bowers v. Baystate Technologies the U.S. Federal Circuit ruled that copyright law does not preempt a "shrinkwrap license" disallowing reverse engineering? Neutrality^talk 07:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

For ALT1: length and date both check out, and offline refs AGF. Harrias ^talk 10:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)