Template:Did you know nominations/Boyd R. Overhulse

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 20:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Boyd R. Overhulse

edit

Created by Orygun (talk). Self-nominated at 03:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC).

  • * Review Good to go! New article, timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. In passing, I note that I had only limited access to those that are "subscription required" (for "newspapers.com"). As to those I WP:AGF. Earwig's copy violation detector: Boyd R. Ovehulse report gives it a clean bill. Hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. Hook is short enough, interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. It is IMO the best possible (hookiest) hook from this article. QPQ done, although article is not yet promoted (not required). 7&6=thirteen () 10:58, 30 January 2016 (UTC)