Template:Did you know nominations/Boyle v. United States

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Boyle v. United States

edit

Created by Coemgenus (talk). Self-nominated at 22:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC).

  • Two problems: a) one point of fact unreferenced[1]; one ref which does not support stated facts[2]; Otherwise AGF on offline sources; b) Hook a little long (180 characters), shorter would be better.
    Other tests all met: New: less than 7 days old (created 7 May, nominated 10 May)
    Well-written, long enough: prose size 6337 B
    Within policy: neutral, free of close paraphrasing, copyvio and plagiarism
    Hook: interesting, accurate, supported by inline citation.
    QPQ met. Pinging creator/nominator Coemgenus. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:18, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Both should be adequately referenced now, if I understand what you meant. --Coemgenus (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Coemgenus. The sources cited are offline, but naturally I AGF that they have been used accurately. So we're good to go. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Referencing problems resolved, so we're good to go with AGF on offline sources. Others may wish to suggest a shorter hook. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I added an alt hook, but it's nearly as long. I'm open to suggestions. --Coemgenus (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)