Template:Did you know nominations/Brahma Upanishad

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 20:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Brahma Upanishad

(

)

~~... that according to the Brahma Upanishad, Prana is drawn into the Brahman through the nerve chords in a similar way a falcon considers the sky as means of communication to reach its abode?~~

ALT ... that according to the Brahma Upanishad, a living being controls all the senses similar to a spider, which weaves its web (pictured) with a single thread?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Belgrade printing house

Created by Nvvchar (talk), Redtigerxyz (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 17:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC).

New enough
Long enough
Policy

Neutral
Inline Cites
Free of plagerism

Hook

Shorter than 200 characters
Formatted properly
Interesting - I have concerns about this.

The hooks are interesting in that they grab my attention and make me curious to read the article; however I don't think either of them, particularly hook 1, really makes sense to someone not familiar with the Hindu religion. Reading the article does little to clarify things. That said, interesting is a matter of taste. However, I'd still like this to be more approachable to someone who knows nothing about Hindu.

Accurate and cited with in-line citation.

(Hook 1 has a citation at the end of the paragraph containing the hook, but not a citation to the specific sentence. Hook 2 is properly cited.)

Neutral and free of BLP vios

Other

QPQ - not done, and nominator claims over 1,000 DYKs
Images free, used in article, and appropriately sized.

Overall, I prefer Hook 2. My objection under "interesting" should not preclude this from being on the main page, but is something to think about in revising the article. Do a QPQ (might I suggest Template:Did you know nominations/Hammerton Killick?) and I think this is good to go. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk;Contribs)}problem solving 19:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

ONUnicorn, QPQ Belgrade printing house (see Reviewed) is already done. Striking out hook 1. Please pass hook 2 (ALT).Redtigerxyz ^Talk 19:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Whoops, I didn't see that reviewed note there. Not sure how I missed it. Sorry. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 19:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict) ONUnicorn, can you please come a appropriate tick to pass this. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 19:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean, unless you just want me to put another big green check mark like I just did. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 20:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, that confirmed green tick. Thanks. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 20:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)