Template:Did you know nominations/Bridget Chaworth

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 19:20, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Bridget Chaworth

(

)

~~... that Bridget Chaworth served Elizabeth I for twenty-five years?~~

Reviewed: Saint Spyridon Church

Created by NinaGreen (talk). Self nominated at 20:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC).

new and long enough article, sourced and interesting hook. I checked the references, GTG. --Norden1990 (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The hook is rather blah, IMO. Yoninah (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Well, the other reviewer found it interesting, and serving that demanding Queen for 25 years is something she probably deserves to be noted for. :-) NinaGreen (talk) 05:55, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

How about:

ALT1 ... that the inscription on Bridget Chaworth's monument commemorates her 25 years of service as a gentlewoman of the Privy Chamber to Elizabeth I and 14 years of service to Anne of Denmark? NinaGreen (talk) 16:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, that's better, and I added what her "service" was about. Hook ref verified. ALT1 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 16:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

You can't approve a hook you yourself have proposed or contributed to. New reviewer needed for ALT1.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

The rule only says that you can't approve your own hook, not that you can't tweak someone else's. Yoninah (talk) 16:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)