Template:Did you know nominations/Capitoline Brutus

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 14:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Capitoline Brutus

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

Capitoline Brutus

• ... that there is no direct evidence that an ancient Roman bust known as the Capitoline Brutus (pictured) actually depicts the Roman consul Lucius Junius Brutus (d. 509 BC)?

• ALT1:...that the ancient Roman Capitoline Brutus (pictured) was discovered in Rome during the 16th century?

Created/expanded by PericlesofAthens (talk). Self-nominated at 12:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC).

• No issues found with article, ready for human review.
  • ✓ This article is new and was created on 11:15, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
  • ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 2702 characters
  • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
  • ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (4.8% confidence; confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
  • ✓ The media File:Capitoline Brutus Musei Capitolini MC1183 02.jpg is free-use
  • ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 152 characters
  • ✓ The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 85 characters
  • ✓ PericlesofAthens has fewer than 5 DYK credits. No QPQ required. Note a QPQ will be required after 5 more DYKs.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

• Long enough, new enough, neutral, well cited throughout, and no copyvio or close paraphrase found.

Both hooks are all right for length, AGF for citations to printed sources. Image is free, QPQ not required as explained by bot. Ready to go. Moonraker (talk) 19:27, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

• • Ancient Rome is a pretty redundant link. Better link "ancient Roman bust" to Roman sculpture. Johnbod (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

• • Is it my responsibility as the nominator to fix links like that? Or is that something that you guys do? Sorry, I haven't done this in a while. Lol. Pericles of Athens^Talk 03:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)