- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Converted from a redirect by Alekjds (talk). Self-nominated at 15:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC).
- Comment Review under way. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:41, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- DYK checklist template
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Image eligibility:
Overall: 
Passes DYK checklist.
- Review Good to go! New article, timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. In passing, I note that I did not have access to the offline sources. As to those I WP:AGF. Earwig's copy violation detector: Casa Santa Maria report gives it a clean bill. Hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done, but article not yet promoted. Kudos for a comprehensive and well-researched and written article! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
- n/a
Passes DYK checklist.