Template:Did you know nominations/Casualty (series 29)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Casualty (series 29)

edit

Improved to Good Article status by ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) and Soaper1234 (talk). Nominated by Soaper1234 (talk) at 15:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC).

  • Article was promoted to GA on 16 June 2017 and nominated at DYK on 17 June 2017‎, so within 7 days. Article is long enough (DYK check shows 15915 characters, excluding episode lists, etc). The article is written from a neutral point of view, cites its sources and contains no copyright issues. QPQ verified. Both hooks are cited, however, the first hook I think is slightly misleading as the article states the episodes were "potentially" some of "the most dramatic episodes" and the source is a reviewer wondering if the episodes could be the most dramatic in three decades. I think ALT1 is more interesting, and there are no problems with it. Other articles should be linked, so I would go ahead with this:
ALT2: "...that the BBC medical drama series Casualty received criticism for a series 29 episode which featured a crash that viewers believed resembled the 2014 Glasgow bin lorry crash?"
which is 174 characters long. I would say it's good to go unless ALT2 now needs to be checked by someone else... — anemoneprojectors 18:27, 1 July 2017 (UTC)