Template:Did you know nominations/Centennial Broadcasting

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 03:30, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Centennial Broadcasting

edit

Created by Neutralhomer (talk). Self nominated at 15:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC).

  • Article meets newness and size criteria. There are no obvious policy issues with the article.
  • Both hooks look good, and both are supported by a citation in the article (which checks out).
  • There is no indication of a QPQ review at the moment, nor any indication the nominator is claiming an exemption. Pending resolution of that, this is good to go. Imzadi 1979  03:42, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • He is claiming five DYK credits, which means that a QPQ is needed. Marking as not ready until one is provided. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:38, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • My apologizes for the slow reply and for the lack of QPQ. I wasn't aware that one had to review an article first. I have reviewed one and added it above. - NeutralhomerTalk • 06:49, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Confirming that there is now a QPQ. All other elements of the review were handled by Imzadi1979. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
  • promoter's comment: Promoted original hook absent expressed preference from nominator or reviewers. Short and catchy Montanabw(talk) 03:30, 12 April 2014 (UTC)