- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Keilana|Parlez ici 05:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Charles Winick
edit... that in a ten-year study published in 1971, sociologist Charles Winick found that while prostitution was a $1 billion-a-year industry, American prostitutes earned little more than clerical workers?
Created by Coretheapple (talk). Self-nominated at 15:53, 15 July 2015 (UTC).
- added "American" to the hook to show the scope of his study Victuallers (talk) 13:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that in 1971, Charles Winick found that American prostitutes earned little more than clerical workers?
New enough, long enough, well referenced, neutrally written, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. The hook ref is verified and cited inline, but the source is referring to "clerical workers", not "clerks". Would you like to adjust the article and the hook? Yoninah (talk) 21:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Done Victuallers (talk) 13:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
