Template:Did you know nominations/Child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 13:54, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Child of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge

edit

Duchess of Cambridge in June 2013

Created by Bo.Clive (talk), Surtsicna (talk). Nominated by Surtsicna (talk) at 21:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC).

I am not sure which hook is better ("hookier"). The first one does not reveal a lot and thus entices the reader to click on the link, but the second one contains two big names and a photograph. Perhaps we could use the first one if the article is promoted without the image and the second one if the image is deemed good enough? Surtsicna (talk) 11:13, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

  • My pick goes to the original hook. All criteria met; long enough, new enough, no copyvio and QPQ done. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 04:47, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the quick review! The hook should probably be featured as soon as possible - the baby may come any day now. Surtsicna (talk) 10:16, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment. I have suggested on article's talk page that the article is moved to Unborn child of..., as I don't think it's right to call it child of yet. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 11:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
    • I've responded to the talk page, but to sum it up here: Merriam-Webster and other dictionaries confirm that the word "child" can refer to "an unborn or recently born person" as well. Referring to the child as a "child" is accurate. Surtsicna (talk) 11:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)