Template:Did you know nominations/Chris Galletta

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Nmillerche (talk) 02:33, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Chris Galletta

edit

Created by 97198 (talk). Self nominated at 10:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC).

  • Article is under the character limit (only 1466). Kindly expand. Hook is verified by inline citation. However, this source is a bit iffy to me and would prefer a citation from a more reliable source. Not satisfied with the QPQ done. Left a comment in this regard at Template:Did you know nominations/Jennie Patrick. EagerToddler39 (talk) 14:15, 23 February 2014
  • Ready for review. I added some text to take the article past the 1500-character threshold. --Orlady (talk) 23:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
  • The following was reviewed by EagerToddler39 based on the DYK criteria:
  • Newness & length - Article new at time of nomination. Prose now adequate at 1727 characters thanks to expansion by Orlady.
  • Neutrality - No issues noted.
  • Close paraphrasing/copyvio - Found a few instances of close paraphrasing: Article - 1) "where he majored in television and film studies he" / Source - "where he majored in television and film studies he". 2) "on the 2009 black list" / Source - "on the 2009 black list a". 3) "was the thesis of his degree" / Source "was the thesis for that process". 4) "sold a pitch to new line cinema" / Source - "sold a pitch to new line cinema" 5) " was commissioned to write the script" Source - "was commissioned to write it" 6) " intern on the late show with david letterman" / Source - "the late show with david letterman"
  • Content verifiability - Abundant use of inline citations.
  • Hook format & verifiability - Hook length within policy. Hook fact appears in article and is verified by Footnote 6 but I still have the same objections about this source.
  • QPQ - Confirmed
  • Please fix the close paraphrasing issues and locate a more appropriate citation to support the hook fact. EagerToddler39 (talk) 15:13, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry for taking so long to respond, and thanks for the thorough review. I've fixed most of the instances of close paraphrasing, where possible. I've also added another inline citation to verify the hook fact from what looks like a more reputable source. 97198 (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)