Template:Did you know nominations/Chris Stringer (footballer)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 08:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Chris Stringer (footballer)
edit- ... that footballer Chris Stringer made his professional debut as a substitute after 13 seconds of a league match when the starting goalkeeper received the fastest red card in English Football League history? Source: The Guardian
- ALT1:... that footballer Chris Stringer was forced to retire at the age of 20 after developing blood clots in both legs following surgery? Source: Yorkshire Post
5x expanded by Kosack (talk). Self-nominated at 21:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC).
- Reviewed: Guy Allen
Article prose has been expanded about 16x over, and is now over 1600 prose characters, not including spaces. Article was expanded today, so qualifies under the 7 day rule. The first hook is properly cited for the 13 second fact. But, curiously, the article has a different cite to a source that indicates 12 seconds? I thought that odd. I wonder if that can be better supported as 12 or 13? Second hook is cited as well. Earwig report clears copyright concerns, thought a slight adjustment of "his retirement from professional football at the age of 20" would be welcome. Pending a QPQ review from @Kosack:. I looked at template editing history and it looks like there's a lot of 1:1 relationship in the QPQ, so Kosack if you could just review one more that would be great. Why not get ahead of yourself and do more? Nudge, nudge :) I find the 13 (or is it 12?) second factoid to be rather interesting. My only issue is clarifying the 12 or 13 second issue (and the QPQ). --Hammersoft (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Hammersoft: Thanks for the review, I've added two further sources that support the 13 seconds and a QPQ review. Funnily enough I have been wondering about reviewing DYKs in advance so perhaps I will in future. Kosack (talk) 08:00, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Looks good to me now, and QPQ is met now. I know journalists sometimes disagree with each other, so finding another source to support the 13 seconds is great. Thanks for the work Kosack! --Hammersoft (talk) 13:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Hammersoft: Thanks for the review, I've added two further sources that support the 13 seconds and a QPQ review. Funnily enough I have been wondering about reviewing DYKs in advance so perhaps I will in future. Kosack (talk) 08:00, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
