Template:Did you know nominations/Civil Rights Congress

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 16:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Civil Rights Congress, Martinsville Seven, We Charge Genocide, Second inauguration of Harry S. Truman

( Back to T:TDYK )

( Article history links:

• Civil Rights Congress
• Martinsville Seven
• We Charge Genocide
• Second inauguration of Harry S. Truman

)

• ... that an American civil rights group ran campaigns for Black prisoners (pictured), told the world about the Martinsville Seven, protested a presidential inauguration, and accused the US of genocide at the UN?

• Reviewed: Pyramid Mound, VCBC, Mohammad Malas & The Dream (twofer)

Created/expanded by Groupuscule (talk). Self nom at 23:56, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

• Civil Rights Congress expanded enough, new enough, big enough, referenced enough. plagiarism (became known for involvement in civil rights cases ) from http://gdc.gale.com/archivesunbound/fight-for-racial-justice/ though this was not added by Groupuscule Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
• We Charge Genocide big enough, but not a 5x expansion, 2360 to 9831. But is new enough and has reference density required. On sentence infringement "The petition was signed by a handful of people..." with http://facstaff.bloomu.edu/whoward/documents/we%20shall%20be%20free%20class%20project.docx Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:53, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
• YMartinsville Seven big and new enough. It is expanded sufficiently in the time, and all paragraphs are referenced. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
• YSecond inauguration of Harry S. Truman is new enough, expanded enough, and is referenced. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
• YHook is covered by the three later articles and is referenced, an confirmed at least where references are online. However should Black have a capital "B"? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

• Hi Graeme, thank you for the review. I will get going on the issues you mention and I am happy to review three more articles. It was my understanding that 'list' text doesn't count for DYK, in which case I think We Charge Genocide" is expanded sufficiently. It would also be my pleasure to add more text, but this will take a little time. Pace, groupuscule (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
• Regarding capitalization of "Black", this is currently a popular option although not settled. See this search. Various style discussions across Wikipedia have not reached consensus, but "Black" does seem to be the informal consensus from what I can tell. I'm open to other ideas. groupuscule (talk) 23:53, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

• I think everything should be in place now, if you measure expansion of We Charge Genocide based on readable non-list prose. groupuscule (talk) 03:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

• all including We Charge Genocide which is big enough now. Good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC)