Template:Did you know nominations/Cleveland v. United States (2000)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 15:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Cleveland v. United States (2000)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the United States Supreme Court ruled in Cleveland v. United States that video poker licenses are not 'property'?

• Reviewed: United States constitutional criminal procedure

Created/expanded by Lord Roem (talk). Self nom at 01:41, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

• Seems good to me. Date, content, length and hook all satisfactory. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)