Template:Did you know nominations/Climatic regions of Argentina

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 23:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Climatic Regions of Argentina

edit
Strong, persistent winds forms characteristic flag trees such as this one near Ushuaia.
Strong, persistent winds forms characteristic flag trees such as this one near Ushuaia.

Improved to Good Article status by Ssbbplayer (talk). Self-nominated at 15:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC).

  • @Ssbbplayer: The article is a nice GA, no issues like lack of sources or copyvio detected. ALT2 looks most interesting to me. But what does "one of the most intense thunderstorms" mean? Do you want to say the region has witnessed one of the most terrible thunderstorms ever? Which one? Or does it experience terrible ones in general? Sainsf <^>Talk all words 09:17, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
  • According to the article and the source, they mentioned that it has one of the highest frequency of lightning and has one of the highest convective cloud tops in the world. In that source, these observations indicate a more intense thunderstorm. What they are trying to say is that on average, it witnesses terrible ones in general. Ssbbplayer (talk) 04:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Then let us reword the hook like this:
ALT3: ... that the Pampas, one of the main climatic regions of Argentina, witness some of the most intense thunderstorms in the world? Sainsf <^>Talk all words 04:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
ALT3 is more concise than ALT2 so it is better. Ssbbplayer (talk) 04:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
  • for ALT3. Though according to the article 'The Pampas' are plural. Therefore, I changed 'witnesses' to 'witness'. Everything else about this DYK seems to check out just fine. Looks good to go!—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 20:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)