Template:Did you know nominations/Cocaine Bear (bear)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 17:42, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Cocaine Bear (bear)
- ... that a bear ate 75 pounds (34 kg) of cocaine in 1985, and was nicknamed Pablo Escobear? Source: https://www.outdoorhub.com/news/2019/10/02/pablo-escobear-absolutely-bizarre-story-kentuckys-cocaine-bear/
- Reviewed:
- Comment: This is my second DYK nomination, so I do not have to do QPQ.
Created by Di (they-them) (talk). Self-nominated at 08:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC).
- Article just long enough at 1695 characters. DYK is indeed not needed, hook verified and interesting. Article well-referenced with no major hits from Earwig - there's a sentence that hits, but that's half quote, half you can't exactly rephrase anyway. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 13:52, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Di (they-them) and Juxlos: Given the relatively obscure/low reputation of OutdoorHub, I'd wager that it's a typo or retcon from the overwhelming consensus in more reliable sources for "Pablo Eskobear". Can the hook be rectified? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 04:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- ScreenRant also uses Escobear, but well Eskobear will probably be easier to support. Juxlos (talk) 04:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- ScreenRant also probably doesn't beat the sources for Escobear, so, I'll put an ALT1 down... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 04:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that a bear ate 75 pounds (34 kg) of cocaine in 1985, and was nicknamed Pablo Eskobear?
- @Di (they-them) and Juxlos? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 06:16, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Apologies, I didn't realize I had to respond. I see no issue with the alt. Di (they-them) (talk) 20:45, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- ScreenRant also uses Escobear, but well Eskobear will probably be easier to support. Juxlos (talk) 04:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: @Theleekycauldron and Di (they-them): I was going to promote this but I am confused about Escobear and Eskobear. If we are going to use the latter shouldn't it be in the article? Escobear is clearly in the article. Bruxton (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2022 (UTC)