Template:Did you know nominations/Columbia and Nehalem Valley Railroad
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SSTflyer 13:40, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Columbia and Nehalem Valley Railroad
edit
Crib bridge of the Columbia and Nehalem Valley Railroad at the McBride Creek
... that the bridges of the Columbia and Nehalem Valley Railroad were built from horizontal logs (pictured)?
- Reviewed: Friargate Bridge, Derby
- Comment: For WP:QPQ see also User:NearEMPTiness#DYK_Credits_and_QPQs
Created by NearEMPTiness (talk). Self-nominated at 06:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC).
The article is new. Long enough with 1800+ characters. Posted by due date. No image license issues. Earwig's copyvio detector: violation unlikely. QPQ done. @NearEMPTiness: [1] there are OR tags in the article, please provide source. [2] the hook needs to be stated in the article and verifiable to a WP:RS. Please fix these. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 19:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ms Sarah Welch: Thank you very much for reviewing this article. [1] The WP:OR statements have now been removed. [2] The hook is now stated in the caption of the first photograph and proven by the photograph. NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- @NearEMPTiness: I will accept the image and caption, because the image shows the horizontal logs and there is an old print embedded in the image that verifies that the log-bridge is of Columbia and Nehalem Valley Railroad. However, would you please add a source to Bridges section, and the first para of the History section of the article? We don't want dispute tags, in the article, any more, particularly after the green DYKtick. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 18:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ms Sarah Welch: I have now added the outstanding references. NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- @NearEMPTiness: One last item. The DYK hook is "bridges" in plural, and can be interpreted to mean all its bridges were built that way. All I can verify is the photo of McBride Creek bridge. Either we reword the hook to "the McBride Creek bridge...", or we need a source that supports all/most/many bridges were built from horizontal logs. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 20:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ms Sarah Welch: I have now added the outstanding references. NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ms Sarah Welch: Thank you very much for reviewing this article. [1] The WP:OR statements have now been removed. [2] The hook is now stated in the caption of the first photograph and proven by the photograph. NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
@Ms Sarah Welch: Thanks, I propopse the following ALT 1:
- ALT1: ... that the McBride Creek bridge of the Columbia and Nehalem Valley Railroad was built from horizontal logs (pictured)? NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 21:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
