Template:Did you know nominations/Commissioner of Taxation v La Rosa

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Commissioner of Taxation v La Rosa

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the Federal Court of Australia ruled in 2003 that a heroin dealer was entitled to a tax deduction of $220,000 for money stolen during a drug deal? Source: "A convicted heroin dealer will be allowed to claim a $220,000 tax deduction for money he lost during a drug deal, the Federal Court has ruled." Sydney Morning Herald

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/2001 Harrah's 500

Moved to mainspace by Ivar the Boneful (talk). Self-nominated at 14:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Now that's what I call a quirky hook! Gatoclass (talk) 18:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)