Template:Did you know nominations/Connecticut Valley Railroad

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Connecticut Valley Railroad

(

)

... that the Connecticut Valley Railroad, which began operations in 1871, was resurrected in 1971 as the Valley Railroad, a heritage railroad? Source: Karr, Ronald Dale (2017). The Rail Lines of Southern New England : a Handbook of Railroad History (Second ed.). Pepperell, Massachusetts. pp. 111–115.
- ALT1: ... that the Connecticut Valley Railroad successfully fooled the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad into purchasing it by pretending that it planned to expand northwards? Source: Karr, Ronald Dale (2017). The Rail Lines of Southern New England : a Handbook of Railroad History (Second ed.). Pepperell, Massachusetts. pp. 111–115.
- Comment: I'm an hour or so past 7 days after creation, so I understand if this gets declined for that reason. But it's now or never (unless I get this to GA).

Created by Trainsandotherthings (talk). Self-nominated at 19:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC).

Additional comment In my haste to get this done quickly, I added the wrong date to the DYK. It should be filed under January 9, not January 16. My apologies. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
QPQ: Template:Did you know nominations/Rebeca Andrade

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article was created 9 Jan (the time doesn't really matter to me), which was seven days ago. RPS is 5867 B, which is easily long enough. Both hooks are cited inline to an offline source, so I will AGF. QPQ has been done and Earwig looks good. Passing with preference towards ALT1 as I believe that is the more interesting hook. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Promoting ALT1 to Prep 1. And don't worry, you were just 1 hour late or so. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)