Template:Did you know nominations/Corruption in Tajikistan

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Corruption in Tajikistan

edit
  • ... that many employees of Tajikistan's government were mandated to buy shares in the Rogun Dam project to keep their jobs?
  • ALT1: ... that students in Tajikistan are expected to pay bribes for better grades?
  • ALT2: that according to the IMF, Tajikistan's government officials have siphoned off roughly a third of the nation's GDP to offshore accounts?
  • ALT3: ... that much of Tajikistan's law enforcement cooperates directly with the nation's heroin traffickers?
  • ALT4: that the Tajik agency responsible for combatting corruption is controlled by the nation's president, causing any case or investigation to require his approval?

Created by DaltonCastle (talk). Self-nominated at 17:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 00:49, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 11569 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (17.4% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 04:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

  • New enough, long enough. ALTs 0, 1 and 3 short enough and sourced (as is every paragraph). No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found, no maintenance templates found. QPQ done and image properly licensed. ALTs 2 and 4 do not have a source at the end of them, but the others are fine. DaltonCastle, take your pick. Good to go.--Launchballer 16:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)