- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Couma utilis
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall: Books cited need page numbers, but after you do that, we should be good to go User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 16:41, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
-
- Ref 1 isn't formatted correctly User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 15:40, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Dunkleosteus77: That's the way botanical databases abbreviate those things. Flora Brasiliensis has a Wikipedia article. Anyway, I have wikified the citation, but I assure you that you will receive pushback from WikiProject Plants editors if you make a habit of saying those refs are formatted incorrectly. All of Wikispecies and nearly every Wikipedia article on plants is formatted that way. Abductive (reasoning) 22:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)