Template:Did you know nominations/Cynthia Larive

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Cynthia Larive

edit

Created by KLindblom (talk). Self-nominated at 19:42, 23 March 2016 (UTC).

  • The article is new enough, long enough (~2900 bytes of prose), clearly notable, and well enough sourced, with no copyvio detected. The main hook is short enough, but there are two issues with it: (1) "authenticate" is not in the article in connection with heparin and I don't know what it is supposed to mean for heparin. It does appear in the article with respect to foodstuffs, but that's a different claim. (2) The description of what heparin is also does not appear in the article. And ALT2 seems too WP:TECHNICAL to me. But ALT1 doesn't have any of those problems, is interesting, and is properly sourced. So, the verdict: good to go with ALT1. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
  • I am good with ALT1. Thanks for the suggestions and feedback! KLindblom (talk) 18:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)