Template:Did you know nominations/Cyzenis albicans

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Cyzenis albicans, Agrypon flaveolatum

edit

Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 07:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC).

  • Both articles are new enough (one new, one 5x expansion), long enough, and well referenced. Both hooks are verified with reliable sources. Two QPQs are done. There is a close paraphrasing issue with the second article, however. The sentence "In an experimental effort to keep the winter moths in check, thousands of Cyzenis albicans were released in 2015 in 17 sites across New England, including sites in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Maine" is too close to the source "In an experimental effort to keep the winter moths in check, Elkinton’s team has released thousands of Cyzenis albicans flies in 17 sites across New England, including sites in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Maine." -Zanhe (talk) 00:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
  • @Zanhe: That's what happens when one expands a stub and fails to check whether the single existing sentence is a copyvio, leaving it in the expanded article's lead. It should be OK now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Yes, I see that the copyvio was added by an IP in 2015. Thanks for fixing that. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC)