Template:Did you know nominations/Dallas B. Phemister

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Dallas B. Phemister, Phemister graft

edit

5x expanded by Premeditated Chaos (talk). Self-nominated at 06:30, 2 September 2018 (UTC).

  •  Doing... Beginning a review for nomination. @Premeditated Chaos:, have you made any progress on the two QPQs? Flibirigit (talk) 15:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
  • So funny story I kind of forgot about this nom entirely (ring the shame bells). I'm just surfing the list now and will get those done ASAP. ♠PMC(talk) 15:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Dallas B. Phemister review

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: See below Flibirigit (talk) 16:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC) Completed review for Dallas B. Phemister. QPQ is outstanding. I also recommend using Template:Infobox person for this article. I also suggest adding more categories but the subject, but this is not critical to the DYK. Will start second article shortly. Flibirigit (talk) 16:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

@Premeditated Chaos: Would you like to add the photo of Phemister to this nomination? Flibirigit (talk) 16:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
I've done the first QPQ as above. I'm happy to add the image although I admit I've never done one in a DYK, so how do I go about that? Finally, with regards to the infobox - I actually don't particularly like adding infoboxes to my bios, especially when they're relatively short I just find it redundant. I wouldn't argue if someone else wanted to but when the article isn't that large I don't see the point. ♠PMC(talk) 16:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
I have added the photo to the nomination. It would be good to have two articles in the photo slot! Flibirigit (talk) 16:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Thanks for adding it. I kept edit conflicting with you trying to add it at the same time, lol :) Working on the second QPQ but I'm at work so it might be awhile. ♠PMC(talk) 17:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
QPQ is good for the first article. Flibirigit (talk) 17:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Phemister graft review

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Reviewed article, and no issues found. DYK is waiting for QPQ. Flibirigit (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

QPQ for the second is now done. ♠PMC(talk) 17:20, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, both articles and both hooks are approved. Flibirigit (talk) 17:51, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! ♠PMC(talk) 18:11, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Note: As the image is fair-use, it does not qualify for appearance on the main page. Images on the main page must be freely licensed. Yoninah (talk) 17:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
My bad, for some reason I was under the impression it was free to use. I'll adjust that. ♠PMC(talk) 19:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the information on the photos. I wasn't aware of that either. Flibirigit (talk) 22:57, 29 September 2018 (UTC)