- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dark Hedges
edit- ... that the Dark Hedges tree tunnel, a popular tourist destination since it was used as the King's Road in Game of Thrones, might not last twenty years? Source: Belfast Telegraph
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Created by PaleCloudedWhite (talk). Self-nominated at 22:43, 23 April 2017 (UTC).
This is not yet a full review, but the page size tool is currently showing only 1444 bytes of prose (not counting references, figure caption, or section headings). It needs 1500 to be eligible for DYK. Would it be possible to expand it a little more? Additionally the entire phrase "Department of the Environment Planning Service placed a Tree Preservation Order on" appears to be lifted from http://ccght.org/darkhedges/ and should be rephrased. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:58, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
- The supposed copyvio is very hard to rephrase in any meaningful way (I had already rearranged the sentence), seeing as most of the words constitute the names of a public body and an official order. I have removed the name of the public body. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 06:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- I have added a section about a local ghost, which hopefully makes the article reach the required length? PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 07:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Article is now new enough, long enough, adequately sourced, and free of copyvio. This appears to be only the third DYK for the nominator, so no QPQ is needed. The hook is interesting and its claims are properly sourced. Good to go. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:46, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
