- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
[1] [2]
Created by Chetsford (talk). Self-nominated at 09:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
I would ditch the link to Bundeswehr, I don't think it's necessary and it causes two links to but up against each other as well as drawing clicks away from your article. Also, is there a reason why you've framed this as "leading politicians" rather than "liberal politicians"? In the article, it is stated that these individuals are allegedly targeted for their political leanings. Catrìona (talk) 13:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, Catrìona. I've updated with a new hook and a QPQ. Chetsford (talk) 06:08, 17 November 2018 (UTC)