- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Created by Czar (talk) and Sagecandor (talk). Nominated by Sagecandor (talk) at 00:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
epicgenius (talk) 02:20, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
This was an easy review since there was nothing wrong with this article's eligibility for DYK. However, it does read a bit clunkily, and I've removed some of the awkward punctuation. Otherwise, nice work! epicgenius (talk) 02:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius:Thank you! Sagecandor (talk) 05:21, 2 August 2017 (UTC)