Template:Did you know nominations/Dibby Dibby Sound

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Dibby Dibby Sound

edit
  • Comment: Greenock125 did a lot more work than I did on this one, I just dumped down a quote I found from a newspaper (Metro UK) and he then expanded on it. I then added a few more sentences to top it up to 1,500 characters.

Created by Launchballer (talk), Greenock125 (talk). Nominated by Launchballer (talk) at 10:19, 3 February 2014 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough, long enough, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. However, the hook doesn't appear in the article at all. Launchballer, if you're adding yourself to the creator credits, you also need to supply a QPQ. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Oh, sorry, I wasn't looking in the quotes. Offline hook ref AGF and online hook ref verified; both cited inline. QPQ done. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)