Template:Did you know nominations/Dickran Kouymjian
The following is an archived discussion of Dickran Kouymjian's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by OCNative (talk) 21:07, 17 March 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Dickran Kouymjian
edit- ... that Armenian historian Dickran Kouymjian has published more than a hundred articles on Armenian history and culture?
- Reviewed: Pope Anastasius II
Created by Proudbolsahye (talk). Self nominated at 22:07, 9 March 2013 (UTC).
- The article is new and long enough. The hook is not to long.
I am afraid that sources do not directly support the hook assertion. None of two sources used to support it does not specifically claim that articles were "on Armenian history and culture". I know that it was most probably the case, but maybe it would be better to reword the hook or to provide more sources which directly support the existing wording? --Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- The article is new and long enough. The hook is not to long.
- ALT1 ... that Armenian historian and professor Dickran Kouymjian was awarded the prestigious St.Mesrob Mashtots Medal from Karekin II, the Catholicos of All Armenians?
- ALT1a ... that Armenian historian and professor Dickran Kouymjian was awarded the St.Mesrob Mashtots Medal from Karekin II, the Catholicos of All Armenians?
- ALT2 ... that Armenian historian Dickran Kouymjian has published several books and more than a hundred articles?
- I think that ALT1 is the best, but without prestigious (it is puffery and unsourced, although it is obviously very prestigious)?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1a provided. I can prove it being prestigious, but I'd rather not risk puffery. Proudbolsahye (talk) 18:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
OK for ALT1a.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- I think that ALT1 is the best, but without prestigious (it is puffery and unsourced, although it is obviously very prestigious)?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
