Template:Did you know nominations/Diego Costa

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 08:42, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Diego Costa

(

)

... that Diego Costa (pictured) scored a record seven goals in his first four Premier League matches?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Enzo Francescoli

Improved to Good Article status by The Almightey Drill (talk). Self nominated at 12:48, 29 October 2014 (UTC).

Everything's good, recently promoted to Good Article, hook's well cited in the article. Only QPQ needed, given reviewed article is being done by some other user. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 01:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- I forgot to sign it. In the article history, you can see that I reviewed that '''tAD''' (talk) 01:29, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Well, image also looks good to me. All done. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 08:31, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

The QPQ submitted isn't really a DYK review, just a comment on article content. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYK Reviewing guide. Yoninah (talk) 21:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Personally I believe that the review of the first hook was adequate, correcting its grammar and asking for clarification, while pointing out that the second hook was entirely unsourced. Before, I have been told that it is not enough to simply look at the hook content, and to point out that an article has machine translation and BLP issues can be part of the review. '''tAD''' (talk) 22:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Okay, agreed with Yoninah and we'd now wait until The Almightey Drill's review is done. DYK will be approved then. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 10:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't think this nomination needs to wait on a stalled QPQ review. The article recently became a GA. The hook facts have inline citations, the image is properly licensed and I detected no policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)