Template:Did you know nominations/Disappearance of Michele Anne Harris
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Disappearance of Michele Anne Harris
- ... that after Michele Anne Harris disappeared 20 years ago today, her husband was tried four times for her murder before being acquitted? Source: "Upstate New York businessman Cal Harris, who was found not guilty last week in his fourth murder trial for his wife’s disappearance, said knowing the legal saga was over was a 'total relief.'", ABC News; June 3, 2016
- ALT0b:... that after Michele Anne Harris disappeared, her husband was tried four times for her murder before being acquitted? Source: same as above
- ALT1:... that after Michele Anne Harris disappeared 20 years ago today, state troopers wearing night vision goggles watched her husband's property in an attempt to get murder evidence on him? Source: "State police stationed troopers with night vision gear around the Harris home ... the search was to no avail"; Binghamton Press & Sun Bulletin; August 19, 2014
- ALT1b:... that after Michele Anne Harris disappeared, state troopers wearing night vision goggles watched her husband's property in an attempt to get murder evidence on him? Source: same as above
- Reviewed: Quine–Putnam indispensability argument
- Comment: I would like this to run on (yes) September 11, the 20th anniversary of her disappearance
Moved to mainspace by Daniel Case (talk). Self-nominated at 19:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article is new enough, long, neutral and sourced. The hooks are cited and interesting. If they can be run on the anniversary that works, but I also added alt hooks that can run at any time. qpq is done. This article has a lot of close paraphrasing on earwig but it looks like this is mostly generic statements and facts. BuySomeApples (talk) 22:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P4