- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 12:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Duffy Site
edit- ... that pottery from the Duffy Archaeological Site in Illinois is distinctive because of its lack of decorative elements?
- Comment: I counted 2240 characters.
I'm on the run, so no time to review anything else; I'll try to get that by tomorrow (UTC). I admit that the Muller source might not initially look reliable from its publication data alone, but this review and this review in major journals (written by archaeological professionals) say that it's a good source for the educated layman, so I don't think there should be any WP:RS problems. Nyttend (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: I counted 2240 characters.
Created/expanded by Nyttend (talk). Self nom at 19:43, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Reviewed Ahmed Dabbah. Nyttend (talk) 02:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Length, creation date, and level of sourcing all check out. Most sources taken on good faith because I can only access bits of them through Google books snippet view, but there do not seem to be any problems with copied wording. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:45, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
