- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 04:57, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Edith Houghton Hooker
edit
Edith Houghton Hooker
Created by 97198 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
Core criteria checked per above template. They pass muster, with 15.3% Earwig copyvio score explained by unavoidable duplication of organizational titles, etc. from source. I might add, that as a native Marylander, I was completely unaware of Ms Hooker until this article. That lent it especial interest for me. Although nominator does not say so, this would be an excellent choice for Women's History Month. Article is GTG.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Core criteria checked per above template. They pass muster, with 15.3% Earwig copyvio score explained by unavoidable duplication of organizational titles, etc. from source. I might add, that as a native Marylander, I was completely unaware of Ms Hooker until this article. That lent it especial interest for me. Although nominator does not say so, this would be an excellent choice for Women's History Month. Article is GTG.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)