Template:Did you know nominations/Emma Wiggs

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  12:45, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Emma Wiggs

edit

5x expanded by January (talk). Self-nominated at 12:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC).

  • Comment only January, as you think the trimmed version is too brief, it has been added as an ALT. Shorter hooks are usually better hooks. Edwardx (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I just found that rewording slightly abrupt, and I don't think shortening a 136 character hook by 9 is a significant difference. January (talk) 21:46, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • The article is new enough, long enough (with a near 10x expansion) and within policy regarding neutrality and sourcing, with no Copyvios detected by me or by Earwig. Both hooks are interesting and ok for length and sourcing. QPQ has been met. Alansohn (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2016 (UTC)