Template:Did you know nominations/Every Frame a Painting
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Every Frame a Painting
edit- ... that creators Taylor Ramos and Tony Zhou developed the editing style of Every Frame a Painting to avoid copyright claims from YouTube's Content ID system? Source: [1] [2]
Created by Axem Titanium (talk). Self-nominated at 23:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC).
@Axem Titanium: Doing this now - basic criterion passed, so I'm gonna go for some factual checks: On the job division - I seem to read the Medium blog post as Zhou doing the editing, not both of them for finals. But otherwise, it seems good to go. Juxlos (talk) 22:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing the review! The Medium post notes that the videos are credited "Written & Edited by Taylor Ramos and Tony Zhou". Collaborating on the final edit seems to be the best summary I could come up with for "I edit every draft [...] I am the first and last audience that sees everything before it goes out [...] he is the editor, and I am the editor’s editor." The post also gives an example "you’ll see Tony edited version 1 of the Chuck Jones video by himself. Then we worked together for 7 days to create version 7 (the final)". Axem Titanium (talk) 22:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- It's a little bit hard to get from the source - do you think you can reword it to better reflect what they're saying. I don't see the collaboration part from the quotes. Juxlos (talk) 19:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- I made a small wording change. Does that reflect better? Axem Titanium (talk) 06:37, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- It's a little bit hard to get from the source - do you think you can reword it to better reflect what they're saying. I don't see the collaboration part from the quotes. Juxlos (talk) 19:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing the review! The Medium post notes that the videos are credited "Written & Edited by Taylor Ramos and Tony Zhou". Collaborating on the final edit seems to be the best summary I could come up with for "I edit every draft [...] I am the first and last audience that sees everything before it goes out [...] he is the editor, and I am the editor’s editor." The post also gives an example "you’ll see Tony edited version 1 of the Chuck Jones video by himself. Then we worked together for 7 days to create version 7 (the final)". Axem Titanium (talk) 22:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hold it. Writing like "flying under the algorithm's radar" doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article, and I'm not so sure "unpacks a particular idea" does either. Sorry, grumpy today. EEng 22:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
- What exactly is your objection to it? "Doesn't belong in an encyclopedia" is pretty vague. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- They're hip idioms. Write instead, "avoid being flagged by the algorithm" and "explores/highlights one particular idea/concept". Like I said, I was in a grumpy mood, and icky writing isn't a DYK bar, but I'd rather not see it featured on the main page. EEng 21:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware my writing was so hip. Changed. Axem Titanium (talk) 00:04, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
- They're hip idioms. Write instead, "avoid being flagged by the algorithm" and "explores/highlights one particular idea/concept". Like I said, I was in a grumpy mood, and icky writing isn't a DYK bar, but I'd rather not see it featured on the main page. EEng 21:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- What exactly is your objection to it? "Doesn't belong in an encyclopedia" is pretty vague. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)