Template:Did you know nominations/Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament

edit

Created by Brustopher (talk). Self-nominated at 23:47, 21 July 2015 (UTC).

  • Everything looks good. GTG! -- Frankie talk 09:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @FrB.TG: this is not the way to do a DYK review, and if you are using any of these reviews for a QPQ, they will be disqualified. You should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Yoninah (talk) 20:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah: Sorry. I was feeling a bit lazy about typing not that I didn't check for the criteria. -- Frankie talk 20:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Here is the full review:

  • The article is new: Green tickY
  • The article is long enough: Green tickY
  • The hook is interesting: Green tickY
  • The hook is referenced: Green tickY
  • The hook is below 200 characters: Green tickY
  • A google search does not reveal any copyright violation: Green tickY
  • The article follows most other important policies: Green tickY
  • QPQ: Green tickY Seems to be okay. -- Frankie talk 20:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Restoring your tick. Yoninah (talk) 20:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)